The Fifth Sunday in Lent: Is That Light up ahead?

Jeremiah 31:31-34; Psalm 51:1-12 OR Psalm 119:9-16; Hebrews 5:5-10; John 12:20-33

I returned to my dark wood/light fading metaphor of Lent before checking out the lectionary passages for today. I have discovered the title couldn't be more apt. For the lectionary texts today (choosing either Psalm option) seem to signal a shift from darkness to light, from the coldness of night to the warmth of a dawning new day. Jeremiah's "new covenant" passage is justifiably famous in Christian circles, and even though I would quibble with a too-hasty Christologizing of this promise, reading it in the light of Christ is not prima facie abusive of the significance of the text. What gets us into problems is, once we see that a certain text may point forward to Christ, or that Christ may fill full the significance of a given text (and the emphasis is very important), then we assume that Christ is what the authors/editors/compilers of the text in question had in mind first, middle, and last.

Such an assertion is impossible, and indeed is the ultimate root not only of ignorance of the Old Testament but perhaps some anti-Semitic sentiment as well. (NOTE: I do not suggest that ALL anti-Semitism comes from hasty Christologizing of the Old Testament; such a suggestion would suffer from several logical fallacies: ad hominem, post hoc ergo propter hoc, equivocation, and probably many others). There is simply NO WAY that Isaiah of Jerusalem had Jesus in the manger in mind when he gave the promise to King Ahaz that is now enshrined in Isaiah 7:14 and Christmas cantatas from here to eternity. But, that does not mean that Matthew was mistaken or untoward in suggesting that Jesus' coming was like the baby promised so long ago: he will be called Immanuel, for he will save his people from their sins.

In one of my classes this week (the last week of the semester), I believe Old Testament Theology, we were discussing this very point, or at least a similar one. It is one of my maxims that the NT can say it fulfilled the OT, but that in no way exhausts the signficance of the OT. This is a very important point, but it should also not imprison us the other way either. There is nothing to say that there could not be more events to which the prophecies of the OT could be reasonably applied (what the NT means by "fulfillment"). Thus, in the present economic crisis, the word of Jeremiah could be that a new day is coming, in which Yahweh will enter into a new covenant with his people, even though they broke the old one through casual misuse of their financial futures to have the latest gadget or maintain their profit margin on the backs of the poor. This is a word that can be spoken to us. And it is one to which we should listen.

The significance of Psalm 51 and its penitential wailing for the season of Lent should be easy to see, so I'll pass it by without comment. Psalm 119, however, seems to strike a similar chord to Jeremiah 31. In inquiring after how young people can keep their ways pure, this Psalm in some way hits on the theme that the young people do, indeed, have an opportunity to live better than their parents. In the old style capitalist mindset, "young people living better than their parents" meant that they were more wealthy, more secure, more gadgets, more cars, bigger houses, more this, bigger that, more the other thing. And we sacrificed our futures to get it, so now those chickens have come home to roost. The vision of Psalm 119, however, seems to be different--young people living better than their parents is not getting more and keeping more and having more and wanting more--but keeping fast to the law of God, which throughout the OT always has a concern for building up treasure where moth and rust do not destroy, to borrow a NT phrase.

The Hebrews and John passages speak to a similar theme. The sermon of Hebrews suggests that Jesus has brought about a new way of living, by being designated as high priest forever, according to the order of Melchizedek. I haven't any idea what this is supposed to mean, other than to dive into the etymology of Melchizedek and say it means "the king of righteousness." And the lyrical statements of Jesus in John 12, namely that the king of righteousness must die in order to produce life in his disciples is very poignant in this time of economic struggle. Something in our world is dying, or was already dead but we didn't notice the smell of the rotting corpse until just a few months ago. And although the death of Jesus was ultimately a happy thing in that it brought about the victory over sin and death, it was still a very painful thing for him and for those who followed him and witnessed it. And ran away. Would that we not run away in the sight of the death of the old way of doing things in our world, but instead construct a brighter future, entering into a new covenant with God. Amen.